Auteur/autrice : Martin Ransom

  • Responsabilité du journaliste

    Responsabilité du journaliste

    « (…)les hommes de médias devraient prendre leur place, toute leur place, et réfléchir sérieusement aux notions de neutralité et de responsabilité. De nombreux acteurs desdits médias ont, en effet, une fâcheuse tendance à se retrancher derrière leur « nécessaire » neutralité pour nous présenter des reportages sans enquête sérieuse, des informations « brutes », sous prétexte que l’auditeur saura juger de lui-même. Ils oublient simplement – ou feignent d’oublier – qu’un esprit critique s’exerce à vide s’il n’est pas suffisamment informé et informé de façon suffisamment objective. « 

    (Georges Charpak, in H.Broch & G.Charpak, Devenez sorciers, devenez savants)

  • Fusée en 3D : Terran-1

    Fusée en 3D : Terran-1

    On connait l’impression en 3D. Il existe des sociétés qui construisent des maisons en 3D. Mais aujourd’hui, mercredi 8 mars, à Cap Canaveral, s’élancera – si tout va bien – pour son vol inaugural la toute première fusée construite entièrement par des imprimantes 3D. Elle s’appelle Terran-1 de la société Relativity Space, crée il y a 7 ans.

    Des robots à son usine à Long Beach en Californie ont pu imprimer ce lanceur, 33 mètres de long, 2,30m de diamètre, depuis la matière première de métal spécial jusqu’au pas de tir en 60 jours au lieu des 24 mois d’une fusée classique. Elle compte moins de 1000 pièces au lieu de 100,000 d’un lanceur conventionnel ce qui, selon la société, augmente considérablement sa fiabilité.

    Source et images de Relativity Space

    La fusée à deux étages est capable de mettre en orbite des charges de 1,250kg en orbite héliosynchrone, et a été conçue pour être récupérable et réutilisable. Relativity Space voit loin, avec un projet d’envoi d’une capsule, « Insight », sur la Lune avec une version Terran-3 de sa fusée. Ce premier vol d’une telle innovation va être surveillé de très près.

  • New Space hype

    New Space hype

    I have always had doubts about the term « New Space » now too often used not just by startups but also the major actors such as ESA or Ariane launcher related companies.

    In recent times it’s even been used by, for example, ESA’s Director-general Josef Aschbacher, the CNES French Space Agency’s Président Philippe Baptiste, Arianespace CEO Stéphane Israël, and the Ariane Group… Their communication teams all use the term in press communiqués and on social media. They use « New Space » as a very positive, forward-looking qualification. My dislike for the term is intimately related to the hype that is made of approximations, replaces reality and often conceals falsehoods.

    So it has been a pleasure to discover an analysis of this hype in a latest publication by the Astralytical.com consultancy website, based in Atlanta Georgia since 2016. Laura Forczyk is its Executive Director. According to its website the « focus is high-quality big-picture outlook on the emerging space sector« . This enlightening article by John Holst, Editor/Analyst entitled « Ill defined Space » was published on 6 March and focuses on startup companies but must be extended to the major players. It is a must read.

    Space Startups and Hype: Finding Facts in the Flash

    Some gain traction using a critical communications channel, typically a reporter, who then keeps the cycle turning, creating a snowball of special reports, interviews, and excited forecasts about the next best thing. When that happens, the cycle is successful since hype is promotion that relies on extravagant or exaggerated claims.

    Exaggerated Importance?

    Space startups are known for their hype cycles. They often embellish and inflate their importance to the planet (and investors). They are trying to gain attention by making themselves appear more significant than the toy dogs they are.

    « New space » is a marketing term to hype space industry startups. That hype contrasts with a space industry dominated by slow-moving, entitled, legacy companies such as Boeing, ViaSat, and United Launch Alliance.

    New space is meant to differentiate those legacy space companies from new companies such as Rocket Lab, OneWeb, and Planet. Adding the words « new space » + startup ratchets up a startup’s hype. It sounds innovative, progressive, entrepreneurial, and hungry.

    In 2021, over 500 investors invested in at least 212 space startups. Not all will be successful, and despite investors’ confidence, not all space startups solve problems.

    However, space startup investors like a return on investment. Some become a part of the hype problem to get that return, promoting their latest investment. Occasionally, they hype a space startup despite the severe challenges facing it. This scenario played out when an investor constantly pushed unrealistic Virgin Galactic visions in press releases and news articles.

    Seeing Through the Hype

    Space startups that use well-grounded hype exist. So how does one identify if a space startup’s hype contains more substance versus one that is only a pile of hype? It might be tempting to follow the advice in the refrain, « Just don’t believe the hype. » However, there are some rules of thumb to avoid falling victim to predatory space startup « hypeness. »

    A simple method is to rely on the maxim, « If it is too good to be true, it probably is. »

    There are reasons why some people are bothered by a space startup’s hype. Why will an asteroid mining venture be different this time if its plans are similar to those of defunct asteroid mining startups? Those questions and others originate from a person’s experiences, providing some wisdom about life.

    It is a reason why some entrepreneurs spin stories, as they attempt to replace investors’ and customers’ critical thinking with greed. Critical thinking diminishes the desired effects of a space startup’s hype.

    A way to see a startup’s hype cycle can also be helpful. The tool at hand for determining a company’s history of hype is Google Trends. Go to the site, type in a name, and Google Trends provides a decent result. Changing the date range and selecting « News Search » yields the charts below:

    Typing in company names such as Relativity Space or Astra shows some cyclical hype attempts as their PR folks attempt to feed the news agencies the latest favorable company narrative.

    The Hype Cycle

    A tool that purportedly explores hype in-depth is the Gartner Hype Cycle, a methodology consisting of five stages: innovation trigger, peak of inflated expectations, trough of disillusionment, slope of enlightenment, and plateau of productivity. While those names sound like places in the « Princess Bride » or « Labyrinth, » they should not be confused with them. The chart below displays the stages of increasing and diminishing hype over time.

    The Gartner Hype Cycle (author’s version)

     

    The cycle is supposed to help people determine not just the amount of hype surrounding a technology but also make a better guess at where it is in the cycle. According to Gartner, the company uses the method to analyze 95 different cycles. However, Gartner also notes that it takes companies between three to five years for a technology to move through those stages (and then caveats that the speed could vary).

    Gartner heavily promotes its tool, but the cycle’s defined stages remain extremely useful in visualizing the hype surrounding space startups. As it is, space industry observers likely recognize the first two stages of Gartner’s Hype Cycle from numerous space industry startup claims: the Innovation Trigger and The Peak of Inflated Expectations.

    Stage 1

    The « innovation trigger » describes when a new technology’s concept or demonstration shows the potential to be useful (Is it solving a problem?).

    However, there might not be an apparent commercial application. It may be that the technology isn’t solving a problem. Still, the mere concept gets people excited enough to spread the word. Several space industry startups have hyped innovation triggers often.

    Some offer only pretty renderings and appealing ideas. They introduce immature technologies and concepts, such as Moon bases and orbiting solar power stations. All have a common element—they are not real.

    Is it possible for them to become a reality? Yes, but startups would require much more effort, investment, and time (typically more than startups have access to) to make them real. It is all a part of the hype cycle’s first stage.

    Alternatively, Stoke Space is a recent startup in the first stage of the hype cycle. The company is developing a concept, innovative rocket engine configurations, as an approach to creating a fully reusable launch system. The concept’s promise, demonstration, and goal are appealing enough to excite people, but it is squarely in the innovation trigger stage.

    Asteroid mining companies, such as Deep Space Industries and Planetary Resources, are startups that never moved beyond the innovation trigger stage of the cycle.

    Stage 2

    That next stage, the peak of inflated expectations, is when the startup’s technology attracts attention and starts receiving investments for experimentation. Believe it or not, SpaceX’s Falcon 9 may still fall under this stage.

    The rocket is a proven platform that can launch spacecraft into orbit and beyond, but the Falcon 9’s reusability attracts attention. It increases exceptional hype around the company as the still unusual characteristic of reusability draws increasing attention, investor interest, and more customers.

    However, despite the company’s reusability successes, few existing rocket companies seem to see (or at least publicly admit) how a reusable rocket makes sense for them.

    Stage 3

    The cycle’s third stage, the trough of disillusionment, results from unmet inflated expectations and unforeseen challenges. Perhaps it turns out there are problems with the technology or concept. Alternatively, the space startup developing the concept may be losing money and discovering unanticipated challenges. Finally, it may be that the concept offers no solution for the target market—it is unneeded.

    If any of those descriptions sound familiar, it may be because Virgin Galactic appears to be wallowing in the trough. It validated its innovation trigger, the suborbital spaceplane concept, and technology. Following that stage was the company’s buildup to a peak of inflated expectations.

    According to Virgin Galactic, there was a market for quick suborbital rides—after all, a certain number of people put money down to get a ticket to ride. If more people ride to space, their example will excite others into doing the same.

    Nevertheless, after the first passenger ride Virgin Galactic paused its operations, and the factors leading to the trough of disillusionment set in. Investors lost money. The company is facing supply chain problems and safety challenges for its spaceplanes. A year and a half after its only passenger launch, the general excitement and hype for Virgin Galactic’s spaceplanes are fading. However, that does not mean the company is beyond redemption.

    Reaction Engines, Ltd., is another older example of a startup in the disillusionment stage. It received a lot of press and funding for demonstrating a technology that might be able to provide space launch without the use of rocket engines. However, after over a decade, the company has yet to prove that its product can be commercially viable. While it might find its way out, Reaction Engines’ hype cycle is taking much longer than other startups.

    Stage 4

    It may be that Virgin Galactic powers through to the hype cycle’s fourth stage, the slope of enlightenment. A startup or several startups have identified the need for the technology or concept at this stage.

    Perhaps a market can use it—just not the one initially identified. With the first generation left in the trough, a broader customer base might adopt newer, more reliable generations of technology.

    The concept of low-Earth orbit (LEO) broadband satellites may be in that zone. It was never a question of whether it would be helpful. The question was whether it could make a profit, a valid concern considering the faltering decades-long history and the initial hype about how it would serve people in other nations without broadband access.

    At least two companies are fielding these communications constellations, both working on newer generations of their satellites. One of those companies, SpaceX, appeared surprised that its satellites work for an application it never intended and disapproved of that use.

    The surprise may be feigned, but using technology for an application other than the one the company intended is an age-old business conundrum. It is a circumstance that disapproving companies would do well to accept, move on, and learn. That attitude might help them reach the fifth stage: the plateau of productivity.

    Stage 5 (and other notes)

    The plateau is just what it says—the technology is practical enough to gain widespread adoption. People become increasingly productive using it. An example of a technology in this stage is the communications satellites in geosynchronous orbit (GEO), operated by companies such as SES or Intelsat.

    For decades, consumers used those companies’ technology and services. Governments and militaries contract for their services. However, this is the boring part of the hype cycle. What is exciting about technology that works as expected?

    Although, Apple makes an art out of hyping boring technology. It generally lets others struggle through the first three stages and jumps in at the slope of enlightenment.

    As a startup progresses through the hype cycle, it will likely not remain a startup as it reaches the cycle’s end. Also, the various technologies space startups work with require different cycle timelines, as each technology has different dependencies to account for before moving on to the next stage of hype.

    For example, developing and building a communications satellite constellation might be more straightforward and take less time than building a fully reusable launch system. The former concept might complete the cycle in five years, while the other remains in the innovation trigger stage for nearly the same time. It all gets communicated on the chart like so:

    Based on the author’s guesses

    Understanding any company’s place in the hype cycle can help determine a product’s authenticity. It explains why there is discomfort with a space startup’s decision to change concepts, abandoning one somewhere in the hype cycle and starting from scratch with the next one. It means that investment allocated to the initial concept is ill-spent, as the startup’s entrepreneur tries to explain why the change is necessary.

    That type of hype was seen with Astra’s concept, as it went from inexpensive smallsat launch to constellation operator to new smallsat launch and constellation. Each time Astra changed the story, the hype cycle restarted. It is not easy to become excited about a company that does not know what it offers.

    The hype cycle can provide an understanding that a technology is at the peak of inflated expectations, ready to trip into the trough of disillusionment. Maybe it aids in realizing the technology is a dud. Alternatively, perhaps the trough is an opportunity to get in on the action before the technology moves up the slope of enlightenment.

    As annoying as hype is, it is also helpful. Perhaps, however, not as startups intended. Press release frequency, wording, emotion, and carefully worded CEO statements point towards hype cycle stages. Applying hard-won knowledge, online tools, and an alternative view of space startup hype can provide a peek into the realities behind it.  

    John Holst is the Editor/Analyst of Ill-Defined Space, dedicated to analysis of activities, policies, and businesses in the space sector.

  • La belle Cabresse

    La belle Cabresse

    Post de Edwige Morel:

    Jean-Luc Davidas se sent ravi.

    Une nouvelle fois la Guyane est mise à l’honneur avec une nouvelle nomination pour le rhum LA BELLE CABRESSE qui a obtenu la médaille d‘or du rhum blanc agricole au salon de l’agriculture 2023

    Lors de ce concours, c’est l’ensemble des rhums agricoles qui sont en compétition et cette reconnaissance justifie sa qualité

    Une nouvelle preuve du savoir faire des entreprises Guyanaises

    Toutes mes félicitations à la famille PREVOT

    « L’entreprise locale est la force de la Guyane »

    C’est du « vintage / collector » que je ramenais à chaque mission AE et ESA – mais (celle-ci non- ouverte !!) il y a une 15aine d’années par mon fils quand il était à RFO Guyane. Dispo il y a qq années à certains hyper Carrefour et aujourd’hui en pack cubi sur l’Internet CDiscount…

    Dominique Detain
     
    Martin-Olivier Ransom: 
    https://www.delices-de-guyane.fr/fr/ il y a aussi une boutique à Paris
     

    Martin-Olivier Ransom:

    Claude Sanchez : celle-ci t’attend en Lot et Garonne !
    Jean Paul Croizé
    La légende dit qu’autrefois, on en mettait dans les moteurs d’Ariane 😄
    Martin-Olivier Ransom
    Jean Paul Croizé Et ceci n’est pas une légende : les containers qui avaient acheminées les premiers satellite Hotbird vers Kourou revenaient sur Matra Toulouse avec de nombreuses boites entières de Belle Cabresse…😂😂
  • L’histoire de ma femme

    L’histoire de ma femme

    L’Histoire de ma femme: le déshonneur d’un capitaine

    Le Figaro, publié le 15/03/2022 – Film vu le 4/3/2023 – Très beau et réflexion sur la complexité des rapports entre les hommes et les femmes. Léa Seydoux est SUPERBE!

    Dans cette puissante adaptation de L’Histoire de ma femme, Gijs Naber et Léa Seydoux incarnent un couple passionnel dont le duel amoureux est irrigué par une beauté romanesque. Film présenté à Cannes 2021.

    On parie? Jakob épousera la première femme à entrer dans ce café. Son copain hausse les épaules. Son scepticisme ne durera pas: après une fausse alerte, Léa Seydoux pousse la porte. Le capitaine de navire lui demande sa main. Elle est d’accord. Telles étaient les rencontres, dans les pays nordiques, au cours des années 1920. Lizzy, c’est quelque chose. Cette Française pourrait sortir d’un roman de Fitzgerald, avec son sourire en Technicolor, sa chevelure auburn, et l’air de celle qui en a vu d’autres. Banco. L’avenir ne lui fait pas peur. Il faut la voir danser le fox-trot – un tourbillon de sensualité. Jakob en reste bouche bée. Il n’est pas au bout de ses surprises.

    Est-ce bien prudent de partir en mer pour de longues périodes dans ces conditions? Là, il est chez lui. Il lui faut l’océan, l’horizon, les étoiles. À terre, sa maladresse saute aux yeux. Elle le dessert. Quel balourd! Toujours à soupçonner son épouse des pires infidélités. Elle devrait se demander pourquoi ses hommes le respectent, admirer son courage et son professionnalisme à bord. Il n’y a que lui pour sauver un bâtiment en flammes, dompter les éléments et la météo. À Paris et à Hambourg, il est comme l’albatros de Baudelaire. Les brasseries, les salons se transforment en enfer capitonné. C’est un enfer qu’il se construit lui-même.

    L’Obs: critique du 16/3/2022 – écrit par Xavier Leherpeur

    Après « Corps et âmes », ours d’or inattendu et discutable reçu en 2017, la cinéaste hongroise persiste dans la voie d’un cinéma esthétique et évaporé, aux confins du travail d’antiquaire. Dans cette adaptation d’un roman de 1942, tout est à sa place, du moindre bouton de corset aux tasses à café, quand débute cette histoire d’amour. Un capitaine au long cours fait le pari d’épouser la première femme qui franchira le seuil de l’établissement. Début d’une passion qui ne résistera ni aux doutes d’un mari souvent absent ni au désir d’émancipation de sa nouvelle épouse. Même si la longueur (près de trois heures) est injustifiée, le film montre bien, lorsque survient l’amant potentiel, la perversité et l’ambiguïté étouffante du ménage à trois en devenir. Le style faussement étriqué est une métaphore de la morale de l’époque. 

  • Boris nailed hard – au pilori

    Boris nailed hard – au pilori

    Boris a menti. A Londres, une commission d’enquête parlementaire sur les déclarations de Boris Johnson à la Chambre des Communes au sujet des réunions au 10 Downing Street, alors que les mesures d’isolement contre le Covid les interdisaient, comme dans tout le pays, vient de rendre son rapport. Il est accablant pour l’ancien Premier Ministre. Il établit grâce à de nombreux témoignages et photos qu’il aurait bien menti, ou au minimum cherché à cacher les faits au Parlement et au public. Notamment de sa présence à ces réunions et en prétendant que les règles en vigueur avaient été respectées. Boris Johnson va maintenant, dans les jours qui viennent, paraitre en audience devant la commission pour répondre. Beaucoup d’observateurs pensent qu’il aura bien du mal à se justifier et que son avenir politique est très compromis.

    =========

    Réactions : Pierre Nicolas : ce type est une imposture ambulante …. monsieur Brexit a pas fini de faire payer ses mensonges a son pays…

    Jean-Michel D : Le clown est nu … mais le mal est fait 😢

  • Jon Snow book – The Guardian

    Jon Snow book – The Guardian

    why we’re not all in it together

    The news reader tackles privilege and politics in this personal exploration of inequality

    Written by John Harris, published Thu 2 Mar 2023 11.00 GMT

    (Read before receiving the book)

    The morning after the Grenfell Tower disaster, Jon Snow arrived at the offices of Channel 4 News, the programme he had been hosting since 1989. Initially, he and his colleagues did not have much sense of the significance of a story that was just starting to become clear. But after he arrived at the scene having impulsively cycled across London, he realised that he was about to front his channel’s coverage not just of an unimaginable tragedy, but of glaring truths about the modern United Kingdom.

    Fifty days before, Snow and the Microsoft founder Bill Gates had been the judges of a public-speaking contest organised by a charity called Debate Mate. The winner, by some distance, had been 12-year-old Firdaws Hashim, a student at the Kensington Aldridge Academy. Two days into a run of bulletins broadcast from Grenfell, he suddenly saw her image on a “Missing” notice. “This brilliant girl lived with her family on the twenty-second floor,” he writes. “I knew precisely what the poster meant … And at this moment, I burst into tears.”

    Snow’s appreciation of what all this signified was at the heart of the MacTaggart lecture he gave at the Edinburgh TV festival that August, in which he charged the media with standing “comfortably with the elite, with little awareness, contact or connection with those not of the elite”. This uneasy realisation – Snow is open about his own privilege, rooted in a private education – obviously festered. Now, just over a year after his exit from Channel 4 News, he has developed it into a 288-page exploration of inequality, and the kind of social and cultural changes that might reduce it.

    His tone is that of someone suddenly liberated from the restraints of supposed impartiality. Snow mixes autobiography with polite polemic, and tumbles through a range of subjects and locations: education, housing, the reform of parliament, apartheid South Africa, Iran, the invasion of Iraq and its long slipstream – and, in the book’s second half, the media, and the narrow range of perspectives it presents. In a ranking of the most powerful media figures published in 2019, 43% came from privately educated backgrounds: here, he rightly suggests, is a big part of the reason why so much news seems to take the people who deliver it by surprise.

    But even if he now feels unbound, some of his own arguments are proof of those same limitations. He presents the House of Lords as the embodiment of so much of what he decries, but can only propose “an independent commission to look at what would be the best solution”. His analysis of recent political history finds him being too generous to David Cameron and George Osborne, and overly kind to post-Thatcher Conservatism more broadly (is it really true that “racist language” is not “in the tradition of the party” and that Nigel Farage sits outside the parameters of Tory politics?). In general, he hangs on to a Whiggish optimism that sometimes fails to stand up to scrutiny. He also has a habit of extending his criticisms of the media’s highest-profile elements to journalism as a whole. Before the Brexit referendum, he says, “I do not believe any part of the media appreciated the scale of the citizenry’s economic woes”. Some of us did.

    The oversights are occasionally maddening, but Snow is usually redeemed by the self-awareness that underpins most of what he says. The essence of his talents as a news anchor came down not just to his unquenchable interest in his fellow humans, but an urbane, unrufflable disposition traceable to an early life spent among “giant doors, vaulted ceilings and esoteric codes of conduct”. In the future he seems to want, voices like his would recede, leaving the news to be delivered by people closer to their audiences. At that point, perhaps, the “us” in his title might at last mean what it ought to.

    The State of Us: The Good News and the Bad News About Our Society by Jon Snow is published by Bantham

  • ULA for sale ? – Ars Technica

    ULA for sale ? – Ars Technica

    Sources say prominent US rocket-maker United Launch Alliance is up for sale

    The potential sale of ULA comes with many questions for a buyer.

    Published by Eric Berger – 3/1/2023, 5:50 PM

    Two men in business suits stand next to a model spaceship.
    Enlarge/ Tory Bruno (L), CEO of United Launch Alliance, with Amazon founder Jeff Bezos at a news conference in 2014.Win McNamee/Getty Images

    One of the world’s most important rocket companies, United Launch Alliance, may be sold later this year.

    The potential sale has not been disclosed publicly, but three sources confirmed to Ars that potential buyers have been contacted about the opportunity. These sources said a deal is expected to be closed before the end of this year and that investment firm Morgan Stanley and consulting firm Bain & Company are managing the transaction.

    The sale of United Launch Alliance, or ULA as it is known within the industry, would mark the end of an era that has lasted for nearly two decades. The company was officially formed in 2005 as part of a deal brokered by the US government, ensuring the military had access to both Atlas and Delta rockets to put national security satellites into space. To form ULA, Lockheed Martin and Boeing merged their launch businesses into a single company, each taking a 50 percent stake.

    This union was profitable for both parent companies, as ULA held a monopoly on launching national security missions and, effectively, NASA science probes. In return for 100 percent mission success, ULA received large launch contracts and an approximately $1 billion annual subsidy from the US Department of Defense to maintain « launch readiness. »

    In response to a request for comment, Boeing released the following statement: « Consistent with our corporate practice, Boeing doesn’t comment on potential market rumors or speculation about financial activities. »

    Lockheed Martin issued a nearly identical response: « Consistent with our corporate practice, Lockheed Martin doesn’t comment on potential market rumors or speculation about financial activities.”

    The emergence of SpaceX in the early 2010s with the increasingly reliable Falcon 9 rocket started to disrupt this profitable arrangement. SpaceX sold the Falcon 9 rocket at a substantial discount to ULA’s Atlas V and Delta IV rockets. The company also successfully sued the US government to allow the Falcon 9 rocket to compete for national security missions, and SpaceX launched its first one in 2017.

    In recent years, SpaceX has come to dominate United Launch Alliance in terms of cadence. By the end of 2022, the upstart was launching as many rockets each month as ULA launched during a calendar year. During the last four years, in fact, SpaceX has landed more rockets than ULA has launched during its existence.

    However, ULA still holds a prominent place in the global launch industry, and there will likely be no shortage of suitors.

    The Colorado-based company has significant assets. As early as May, ULA will debut its new heavy-lift rocket, Vulcan, which may close some of the gap in terms of price competitiveness with SpaceX. For Vulcan, ULA has an agreement with the US military to launch 60 percent of its national security payloads from 2023 to 2027, and it will likely continue to be successful in this area. ULA has also won a commercial contract to launch 38 missions for Amazon’s Project Kuiper satellite megaconstellation. Finally, ULA has sizable and valuable facilities in Colorado, Alabama, and Florida, and it has strong political capital in those states and others.

    The following companies may (or may not—this is a speculative list) be among the suitors for ULA as the sale proceeds later this year.

    • One of the parent companies, either Lockheed or Boeing, could buy the other out. Lockheed being on the purchasing end seems more likely, given that it has recently made strategic acquisitions in the launch industry, including taking a stake in ABL Space Systems.
    • Amazon is likely to be interested. The company owned by Jeff Bezos would have intimate knowledge of ULA’s business after signing the Project Kuiper launch agreement and may decide it’s better to purchase the company outright than buy services. This would give Amazon the priority access to Vulcan launches it needs to ensure the Kuiper constellation is launched in a timely manner. It would also strengthen Amazon’s ties to the Department of Defense.
    • Blue Origin may also be interested. This is another company owned by Jeff Bezos, but sources said there is a firewall between Blue Origin and Amazon. Blue Origin also won a share of Project Kuiper launches, 12, with its New Glenn rocket. However, there are some questions about how quickly New Glenn can be brought into commercial service, and in buying ULA, Blue Origin could consolidate its share of Kuiper missions and earn guaranteed funding from the Department of Defense. The company would also « save » money on Vulcan launches because it could provide BE-4 rocket engines at cost.
    • Other potential bidders include Northrop Grumman, which has an interest in national security and provides solid rocket motors for Vulcan; L3Harris, which is already purchasing engine-maker Aerojet Rocketdyne; a private equity firm like the industry saw with AE Industrial Partners’ investment in Firefly Aerospace; or even a technology company like Apple seeking to develop its own space constellation for communications purposes.

    The potential sale of ULA comes with many questions for a buyer. Foremost among them is likely to be the long-term viability of the traditional space company at a time when SpaceX has taken the dominant position in the global launch industry. Additionally, there are other US competitors coming up as well, including Blue Origin, Rocket Lab, and Relativity Space. None of these are a near-term threat to ULA, but in five to 10 years, one or more of those companies could have a fully reusable rocket priced substantially below that of Vulcan.

    Another important factor in ULA’s viability is its need for investment. Over the last two decades, the parent companies have tended to pull profits out of ULA rather than investing in the development of new technology. Vulcan, for example, was developed largely with money from the US military. The Department of Defense supported the development of Vulcan’s engines and solids and provided development grants worth $967 million directly to ULA. To become competitive in the new era of commercial launch, a new owner will likely need to free ULA to innovate—and provide the funding to do so.

  • La radio GPT

    La radio GPT

    Si l’intelligence artificielle peut rédiger une histoire et répondre à des questions, ne pourrait-elle pas gérer une station de radio? C’est ce qu’a fait une entreprise américaine, société de communication Futuri dans l’Ohio.

    Elle vient de lancer une station de radio « RadioGPT » qui serait la première radio au monde à fonctionner grâce à des solutions d’Intelligence artificielle. Elle le fait avec la puissance de ChatGPT-3 et un système « TopicPulse », de découverte et de contenu de réseaux sociaux développé par Futuri, ainsi qu’une voix synthétique qui permet entre deux plages musicales d’insérer un contenu d’informations et de commentaires qui s’appliquent à n’importe quelle localité géographique et au format commercial de la station, par exemple le secteur du public visé.

    Ainsi RadioGPT ‘balaye » FaceBook, Twitter, Instagram et plus de 250,000 sources d’information pour identifier les sujets qui sont d’actualité (« trending ») dans une ville ou zone. Il construit alors un script qui peut être utilisé par la voix synthétique qui entre les disques « anime » la radio. Il peut même générer un script pour plus d’un « présentateur », jusqu’à trois en même temps, comme si plusieurs personnes discutaient dans le studio. Il peut même imiter des voix de personnalités connues!

    De même, comme il se fait actuellement, les playlistes de musiques à programmer sont générés par un logicielle d’intelligence artificielle.

    Dans son communiqué de presse le patron de Futuri, Phil Baker en se vantant de ce système écrit: “Grâce aux technologies linguistiques et de contenu de pointe de RadioGPT, nous pouvons offrir une expérience audio innovante, hyper-localisée et en temps réel. En fait, j’ai une telle foi en l’IA que je lui ai demandé d’écrire cette citation pour moi.« 

    Source : Communiqué de presse de la société Futuri. Image de ‘Interesting Engineering’.

  • Souvenir anniversaire SPOT-1

    Souvenir anniversaire SPOT-1

    Il y a 37 ans. C’était un 22 février, 1986… le lancement du premier satellite SPOT par la dernière Ariane-1. Le vol V16 a été le premier à mettre un satellite en orbite héliosynchrone.  (Il y avait aussi le petit Viking). SPOT-1 qui quelques mois plus tard en avril fournit les premières images de la catastrophe de Tchernobyl. SPOT, et que de chemin parcouru dans l’observation de la Terre!

    Photo souvenir avec tant de visages qu’on a bien connu. SPOT, aka le « Satellite Pour Occuper Toulouse » – et j’ajoute: pour passionner les journalistes de la ville rose pour d’autres dans la série. J’ai « laissé passer » haha SPOT-2 avant d’officier comme commentateur de lancement depuis Kourou pour le troisième.

    Souvenirs que je dois à une bonne et fidèle amie, Catherine Rabu Le Cochennec !!